Kako se u međuvremenu istražno i sudski razvija slučaj zlostavljanja djece u Rotherhamu?
Ima li naznaka da će netko iz javnih službi, a osobito policije,
biti oštro kažnjen (pa i zatvorom!) barem za prikrivanje zločina,
ako već ne i za saučesništvo?
Ovaj NY Times-ov članak jasno, iako implicitno, pokazuje u tom smjeru:
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/02/wo...=top-news&_r=0
na primjer u ovom odlomku:
'In the minutes of a meeting about a girl who had been raped by five men, a police
detective refused to put her into the sexual abuse category, saying he knew she had been “100 percent
consensual.” She was 12.'
Međutim, to je američki način gledanja, dok ovaj britanski članak
http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/diane-a...abuse-scandal/
čak indicira da bi moglo biti suprotno - efektivna nagrada javnoslužbeničkom i policijskom ološu iz Rotherhama:
"Something must be done about the ease with which senior officers like Directors of Social Services are able to avoid taking responsibility for scandalous child abuse on their watch.
Many go on to even higher paid jobs. Possibly government needs to look at the contractual arrangements for senior officers to ensure that, when these scandals happen, it is easier to remove them."
Iako ovaj drugi britanski članak oštro zastupa drugačiji pogled na uzroke,
niti tu ne osjećam traženje da netko iz policije zaglavi u zatvoru:
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2014...f-the-iceberg/