IND - Republika Indija (zbirno)

[ruka-slave]

Stravično stanje u Indiji sa sjemenom koje kontrolira Monsanto. 95% sjemena pamuka je u njihovom vlasništvu. Seljaci primorani na njegovo korištenje zbog prisile WTOa, zbog poskupljenja sjemena diktiranim plaćenjem licenci Monsantu, te nužne nabavke pesticida istog proizvođača, masovno se ubijaju, najviše u pokrajini koja je najviše pogođena Monsantnovom "naprednom" tehologijom.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-se...arming/5329947
The entry of Monsanto in the Indian seed sector was made possible with a 1988 Seed Policy imposed by the World Bank, requiring the Government of India to deregulate the seed sector. Five things changed with Monsanto’s entry: First, Indian companies were locked into joint-ventures and licensing arrangements, and concentration over the seed sector increased. Second, seed which had been the farmers’ common resource became the “intellectual property” of Monsanto, for which it started collecting royalties, thus raising the costs of seed. Third, open pollinated cotton seeds were displaced by hybrids, including GMO hybrids. A renewable resource became a non-renewable, patented commodity. Fourth, cotton which had earlier been grown as a mixture with food crops now had to be grown as a monoculture, with higher vulnerability to pests, disease, drought and crop failure. Fifth, Monsanto started to subvert India’s regulatory processes and, in fact, started to use public resources to push its non-renewable hybrids and GMOs through so-called public-private partnerships (PPP)
...
Monsanto’s seed monopolies, the destruction of alternatives, the collection of superprofits in the form of royalties, and the increasing vulnerability of monocultures has created a context for debt, suicides and agrarian distress which is driving the farmers’ suicide epidemic in India. This systemic control has been intensified with Bt cotton. That is why most suicides are in the cotton belt.

An internal advisory by the agricultural ministry of India in January 2012 had this to say to the cotton-growing states in India — “Cotton farmers are in a deep crisis since shifting to Bt cotton. The spate of farmer suicides in 2011-12 has been particularly severe among Bt cotton farmers.”

The highest acreage of Bt cotton is in Maharashtra and this is also where the highest farmer suicides are. Suicides increased after Bt cotton was introduced — Monsanto’s royalty extraction, and the high costs of seed and chemicals have created a debt trap. According to Government of India data, nearly 75 per cent rural debt is due to purchase inputs. As Monsanto’s profits grow, farmers’ debt grows. It is in this systemic sense that Monsanto’s seeds are seeds of suicide.

[ruka-slave]

Malo o masovnih zločinima Britanaca u Indiji. Kkao je UK deindustrijalizacijom Indije uzrokovala masovne pomore između 12 i 29 milijuna Indijaca. U nekim regijama je od gladi pomrlo 1/3 stanvnika.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/crimes...empire/5597781
The desecration in India

It’s said that India was the jewel in the crown of the British Empire. The British East India Company began making avenues into the subcontinent in the 17th century, and India was established as a Crown colony in 1858.

The British Raj systematically transferred the wealth of the region into their own coffers. In the north eastern region of Bengal, “the first great deindustrialisation of the modern world” occurred.

The prosperous two centuries-old weaving industry was shut down after the British flooded the local market with cheap fabric from northern England. India still grew the cotton, but the Bengali population no longer spun it, and the weavers became beggars.

India suffered around a dozen major famines under British rule, with an estimated 12 to 29 million Indians starving to death.

The Orissa famine occurred in north eastern India in 1866. Over one million – or one in three local people – perished. As the region’s textile industry was destroyed, more people were pushed into agriculture, and were dependent on the monsoon.

That year, the monsoon was weak. Crops didn’t grow and many starved to death. The colonial administration didn’t intervene as the popular economic theory of the time reasoned that the market would restore proper balance, and the famine was nature’s way of responding to overpopulation.

When the British finally got out of India, they simply drew a line down the map and partitioned the subcontinent into India and Pakistan. The move led to the mass migration of around 10 million people, and when it escalated into sectarian violence an estimated one million lost their lives.

[darkwood]

ruka-slave kaže:

Stravično stanje u Indiji sa sjemenom koje kontrolira Monsanto. 95% sjemena pamuka je u njihovom vlasništvu. Seljaci primorani na njegovo korištenje zbog prisile WTOa, zbog poskupljenja sjemena diktiranim plaćenjem licenci Monsantu, te nužne nabavke pesticida istog proizvođača, masovno se ubijaju, najviše u pokrajini koja je najviše pogođena Monsantnovom "naprednom" tehologijom.

Fake News :klap:

Whenever someone makes a remarkable claim and cites GlobalResearch, they are almost certainly wrong.


Globalresearch is an "anti-Western" website that can't distinguish between serious analysis and discreditable junk — and so publishes both. It's basically the moonbat equivalent to Infowars or WND.

Monsanto exits cotton seeds business in India

MonsantoBSE is selling its branded cotton seeds business in India to Hyderabad-based Tierra Agrotech

Monsanto pioneered the use of genetically modified (GM) technology, will help secure regulatory approval for Bayer’s acquisition of the US company.

link

Navodi stranicu koja širi teorije zavjere, osim toga ovaj "Fake News" je iz 2013 re-postan na toj Fake News stranici opet 2017 (izgleda da ni teoretičari zavjera nisu što su nekad bili kada "recikliraju" svoje laži, Fake News, Sad.)

Inače Bayer je kupio Monsanto, uz to prije kupnje Monsanto je izašao sa Indijskog tržišta, a sjeme je prodao Indijskoj firmi.

Pa barem da te Fake News up-data-ju svoje lažne vijesti, ali eto izgleda da su i za to lijeni, Fake News, Sad. :klap:

[ruka-slave]

U članku ti inače piše:

In 1995, Monsanto introduced its Bt technology in India through a joint-venture with the Indian company Mahyco. In 1997-98, Monsanto started open field trials of its GMO Bt cotton illegally and announced that it would be selling the seeds commercially the following year. India has rules for regulating GMOs since 1989, under the Environment Protection Act. It is mandatory to get approval from the Genetic Engineering Approval Committee under the ministry of environment for GMO trials. The Research Foundation for Science, Technology and Ecology sued Monsanto in the Supreme Court of India and Monsanto could not start the commercial sales of its Bt cotton seeds until 2002.

And, after the damning report of India’s parliamentary committee on Bt crops in August 2012, the panel of technical experts appointed by the Supreme Court recommended a 10-year moratorium on field trials of all GM food and termination of all ongoing trials of transgenic crops.

But it had changed Indian agriculture already.

Dakle, Indijci su nakon skoro 20 godina, 2012 došli pameti i preporučili 10 godišni moratorij na GM hranu i "probe" sa transgenetskim usjevima. Golema šteta je međutim već počinjena, i poljprivreda u afektiranim krajevima je promijenjena.

A evo i friških iskustava sa Monsntnovim GMO, u Africi recimo Burkina Faso/Gornja Volta:

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-m...-idUSKBN1E21CD
#COMMODITIESDECEMBER 8, 2017 / 12:06 PM / 16 DAYS AGO
Special Report: How Monsanto's GM cotton sowed trouble in Africa
Joe Bavier
22 MIN READ
BOBO-DIOULASSO, Burkina Faso (Reuters) - In 2000, farmers in Burkina Faso, Africa’s top cotton grower, were desperate. Their cotton fetched top prices because its high-quality fiber lent a luxurious sheen to clothing and bedsheets. But pests – bollworms – were threatening the crop.

Even when you dropped the bollworm larvae into a bucket of poison, farmers said, they kept swimming.

U.S. seeds and pesticide company Monsanto proposed an answer: a genetically modified strain of cotton called Bollgard II, which it had already introduced in America and was marketing worldwide. GM was established in large-scale farming in South Africa, but not among the smallholders who produce most African cotton. The Burkina farmers agreed to a trial and the country introduced seeds with the gene in 2008.

The resulting cotton was pest-free, and the harvest more abundant. By 2015, three-quarters of all Burkina Faso’s production was GM, and it became a showcase for the technology among smallholders in Africa. From 2007 to 2015, delegations from at least 17 different African nations visited Burkina to see it.

Farmers weigh cotton at a cotton market in Soungalodaga village near Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso March 8, 2017. Picture taken March 8, 2017. REUTERS/Luc Gnago
But there was a problem. While the bug-resistant genes produced more volume, the quality fell. Last season, the cotton farmers of Burkina Faso abandoned the GM varieties.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/afp...GM-cotton.html
op African producer bans GM cotton
By AFP
PUBLISHED: 07:13 GMT, 24 April 2016 | UPDATED: 07:13 GMT, 24 April 2016

Burkina Faso, Africa's top cotton producer and the sole West African nation to venture into biotech farming, is dropping genetically-modified (GM) cotton on quality grounds.

The world's 10th largest cotton producer, with four of its 19 million people dependent on the "white gold", Burkina Faso earlier this month said it was giving up Monsanto's GM Bt cotton because it had proved uneconomical.

Burkina took up GM cotton in the 2000s in the hopes of bumping up returns on what was then its top export product, surpassed in 2009 by gold.

[darkwood]

ruka-slave kaže:

Malo o masovnih zločinima Britanaca u Indiji. Kkao je UK deindustrijalizacijom Indije uzrokovala masovne pomore između 12 i 29 milijuna Indijaca. U nekim regijama je od gladi pomrlo 1/3 stanvnika.

Opet Globalresearch, GlobalResearch's sources are Russian government or extremely pro-Russian authors.

ruka-slave = Fake News, so sad. :klap:

Prodana duša danas "reciklira" lažne vijesti iz 2013, ni prodane duše i ovi teoretičari zavjera nisu što su nekad bili, kada su spali na "recikliranje".

Indian Independence Act 1947

Old Fake News, So Sad.

[darkwood]

ruka-slave kaže:

U članku ti inače piše:

Dakle, Indijci su nakon skoro 20 godina, 2012 došli pameti i preporučili 10 godišni moratorij na GM hranu i "probe" sa transgenetskim usjevima. Golema šteta je međutim već počinjena, i poljprivreda u afektiranim krajevima je promijenjena.

A evo i friških iskustava sa Monsntnovim GMO, u Africi recimo Burkina Faso/Gornja Volta:

Dale ovi iz Burkine Faso su sami zatražili da im Monsanto riješi problem sa larvama

In 2000, farmers in Burkina Faso, Africa’s top cotton grower, were desperate. Their cotton fetched top prices because its high-quality fiber lent a luxurious sheen to clothing and bedsheets. But pests – bollworms – were threatening the crop.

Da bi nakon njihove pomoći, farmeri imali jak urod pamuka

The resulting cotton was pest-free, and the harvest more abundant. By 2015, three-quarters of all Burkina Faso’s production was GM, and it became a showcase for the technology among smallholders in Africa.

Jedina nuspojava uz taj veliki volumen uroda je bila, slabija kvaliteta pamuka

While the bug-resistant genes produced more volume, the quality fell. Last season, the cotton farmers of Burkina Faso abandoned the GM varieties.

Dakle Burkina je sama odlučila, Kvaliteta ispred Kvantiteta

Tvoj vlastiti post te pokopa.

[ruka-slave]

darkwood kaže:

Opet Globalresearch, GlobalResearch's sources are Russian government or extremely pro-Russian authors.

ruka-slave = Fake News, so sad. :klap:

Prodana duša danas "reciklira" lažne vijesti iz 2013, ni prodane duše i ovi teoretičari zavjera nisu što su nekad bili, kada su spali na "recikliranje".

Indian Independence Act 1947

Old Fake News, So Sad.

Ipak, True News...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeli...g_British_rule

Timeline of major famines in India during British rule

This is a timeline of major famines on the Indian subcontinent during British rule from 1765 to 1947. The famines included here occurred both in the princely states (regions administered by Indian rulers),British India (regions administered either by the British East India Company from 1765 to 1857, or by the British Crown, in the British Raj, from 1858 to 1947) and Indian territories independent of British rule such as the Maratha Empire.


1769–70 Great Bengal Famine - 10 million[3] (about one third of the then population of Bengal).[4]

1783–84 Chalisa famine - 11 million people may have died during the years 1782–84.

1791–92 Doji bara famine or Skull famine - 11 million people may have died during the years 1788–94.

1837–38 Agra famine - 0.8 million (or 800,000).[7]

1860–61 Upper Doab famine - 2 million.[7]

1865–67 Orissa famine - 1 million

1868–70 Rajputana famine - 1.5 million

1873–74 Bihar famine - 0.0 million. (?)

1876–78 Great Famine - 5.5 million in British territory.[7] Mortality unknown for princely states. Total famine mortality estimates vary from 6.1 to 10.3 million.[10]

1896–97 Indian famine - 5 million in British territory.[7] [a]

1899–1900 Indian famine - 1 million (in British territories).[7] Mortality unknown for princely states.[b]

1943–44 Bengal famine - 1.5 million from starvation; 3.5 million including deaths from epidemics.[13]

Dakle, ipak je Darkwood u pravu. Članak u Globar Researchu laže. Umrlo je preko 50 milijuna ljudi a ne samo 12 do 29 milijuna..

Hitler je bio mala beba za Brite.

[ruka-slave]

darkwood kaže:

Dale ovi iz Burkine Faso su sami zatražili da im Monsanto riješi problem sa larvama



Da bi nakon njihove pomoći, farmeri imali jak urod pamuka



Jedina nuspojava uz taj veliki volumen uroda je bila, slabija kvaliteta pamuka



Dakle Burkina je sama odlučila, Kvaliteta ispred Kvantiteta

Tvoj vlastiti post te pokopa.

I kad su shvatili što su dobili, riješili su se Monsanta brzom brzinom. A Burkina Faso je najveći proizvođač pamuka u Africi.
https://www.telesurtv.net/english/ne...0424-0008.html

[darkwood]

@ruka-slave
Prvo si proba svaliti svu krivnju za samoubojstva farmera u Indiji na Monsanto, ignorirajući činjenicu da Indija ima velikih problema sa samoubojstvom farmera općenito, i da najveća krivnja leži u politici i globalnom zatopljenju.
Farmers' suicides in India i Suicides of nearly 60,000 Indian farmers linked to climate change, study claims

Onda si se okrenio na Burkinu Faso, koja je prestala koristiti sjeme od Monsanta koje su oni sami bili tražili, bez da si pružio ikakvi kontekst, jer oko 2000 kada je Burkina zatražila da Monsanto razvije sjeme koje će biti otporno na larve, Burkinin najveći izvoz je bio pamuk, i tada im je odgovarao Kvantitet naspram Kvaliteti, ali kasnije je Zlato preteklo pamuk kao najveći izvoz Burkine, dakle sada im više odgovara Kvaliteta naspram Kvantiteta.

Burkina Faso plans to boost gold exports to 35 tonnes in 2014 from 32 tonnes last year on the back of plans to expand two existing sites, the mines minister said.

Gold leapfrogged cotton to become the landlocked West African country’s main export in 2009 and now accounts for roughly 20 percent of GDP.

link

Ali dno dna koje prodana duša ruka-slave ovdje propagira, je ovo zadnje o gladi i smrti stanovnika Indije za koje (po njemu) je direktno odgovorna Britanija politikom deindustrijalizacije (?), kada je činjenica da Indijski sub-kontinent uvelike ovisi o klimi, i da je smrt od gladi direktno povezana sa klimom.

Indian agriculture is heavily dependent on climate: a favourable southwest summer monsoon is critical in securing water for irrigating crops. Droughts, combined with policy failures, have periodically led to major Indian famines, including the Bengal famine of 1770, the Chalisa famine, the Doji bara famine, the Great Famine of 1876–78, and the 1943 Bengal famine.

link

Te gladi i smrt bi se dogodile, nevezano za vladara, jer nikoji vladar ne vlada klimom.

[ruka-slave]

darkwood kaže:

@ruka-slave
Prvo si proba svaliti svu krivnju za samoubojstva farmera u Indiji na Monsanto, ignorirajući činjenicu da Indija ima velikih problema sa samoubojstvom farmera općenito, i da najveća krivnja leži u politici i globalnom zatopljenju.
Farmers' suicides in India i Suicides of nearly 60,000 Indian farmers linked to climate change, study claims

U članku ti je jasno rečeno da su samoubojstva najčešća u regijama u kojima je najviše uporaba Monsantova sjemena i pesticida.

Onda si se okrenio na Burkinu Faso, koja je prestala koristiti sjeme od Monsanta koje su oni sami bili tražili, bez da si pružio ikakvi kontekst, jer oko 2000 kada je Burkina zatražila da Monsanto razvije sjeme koje će biti otporno na larve, Burkinin najveći izvoz je bio pamuk, i tada im je odgovarao Kvantitet naspram Kvaliteti, ali kasnije je Zlato preteklo pamuk kao najveći izvoz Burkine, dakle sada im više odgovara Kvaliteta naspram Kvantiteta.

Prvo se malo dogovori sa sobom. Jesu li prešli na GMO pamuk zbog larvi ili zbog količine koja je cca 20% veća kod GMO?

Činjenica je Burkina Faso napustila GMO pamuk i vratila se običnome. U tom kontesktu se možemo zapitati odakle su se 2000te pojavile te superotporne larve.

Ali dno dna koje prodana duša ruka-slave ovdje propagira, je ovo zadnje o gladi i smrti stanovnika Indije za koje (po njemu) je direktno odgovorna Britanija politikom deindustrijalizacije (?), kada je činjenica da Indijski sub-kontinent uvelike ovisi o klimi, i da je smrt od gladi direktno povezana sa klimom.

Te gladi i smrt bi se dogodile, nevezano za vladara, jer nikoji vladar ne vlada klimom.

Opet, jasno ti je navedeno u članku da je Engleska kroz "slobodno tržište" uništila tada najnapredniju državu Bengal, koja je imala ogromne prihode od tkanja. Ostavši bez posla, a bez zamjene, ljudi su se morali orjentirati na poljoprivredu. Znamo kako je to završilo - 50 milijuna mrtvih, što je i po mjerilima 20tog stolejća ogroman zločin, a proprcionalno prema broju stanvnika je u 19-om stoljeću zapravo puno veći.

Praktički se to isto desilo i u Irskoj za vrijeme gladi 1843-će. Dok se kroz slobodno tržište izvozila hrana iz Irske u Engelsku, seljaci su skapavali od gladi jer su se morali hrnaiti samo krumpirom kojeg je uništila zlatica. 1943 je Churchil dolsovce odvozio brodovima hranu u Engelsku dok su Indijci crkavali od gladi.

O ostalim britnaskim zločinima imaš na prvom linku, pa slobodno prouči. U svakom slučaju, gdje god su se Englezi pojavili - sj.Amerika, Australija, Novi Zeland, Indija, Južna Afrika...dolazilo je masovnog izumiranja domaćeg stanvništva od uvijek istih razloga - boleštine, glad, deindustrijalizacja, izazivanje stalnih ratova i podjela, konc.logori. Ukratko, oboljeli bi i umirali od Zapadne Civilizacije.

[darkwood]

ruka-slave kaže:

U članku ti je jasno rečeno da su samoubojstva najčešća u regijama u kojima je najviše uporaba Monsantova sjemena i pesticida.


Prvo se malo dogovori sa sobom. Jesu li prešli na GMO pamuk zbog larvi ili zbog količine koja je cca 20% veća kod GMO?

Činjenica je Burkina Faso napustila GMO pamuk i vratila se običnome. U tom kontesktu se možemo zapitati odakle su se 2000te pojavile te superotporne larve.


Opet, jasno ti je navedeno u članku da je Engleska kroz "slobodno tržište" uništila tada najnapredniju državu Bengal, koja je imala ogromne prihode od tkanja. Ostavši bez posla, a bez zamjene, ljudi su se morali orjentirati na poljoprivredu. Znamo kako je to završilo - 50 milijuna mrtvih, što je i po mjerilima 20tog stolejća ogroman zločin, a proprcionalno prema broju stanvnika je u 19-om stoljeću zapravo puno veći.

Praktički se to isto desilo i u Irskoj za vrijeme gladi 1843-će. Dok se kroz slobodno tržište izvozila hrana iz Irske u Engelsku, seljaci su skapavali od gladi jer su se morali hrnaiti samo krumpirom kojeg je uništila zlatica. 1943 je Churchil dolsovce odvozio brodovima hranu u Engelsku dok su Indijci crkavali od gladi.

O ostalim britnaskim zločinima imaš na prvom linku, pa slobodno prouči. U svakom slučaju, gdje god su se Englezi pojavili - sj.Amerika, Australija, Novi Zeland, Indija, Južna Afrika...dolazilo je masovnog izumiranja domaćeg stanvništva od uvijek istih razloga - boleštine, glad, deindustrijalizacja, izazivanje stalnih ratova i podjela, konc.logori. Ukratko, oboljeli bi i umirali od Zapadne Civilizacije.

Opet lažeš, i širiš propagandu i laži, ideš po temama od Ukrajine, Izraela do USA i samo sereš, kao da imaš proljev, i tu postavljaš linkove od stranica koje šire laži, propagandu i teorije zavjere, izvrćeš stvari, ignoriraš činjenice i širiš propagandu, i onda se tu nešto žališ kada te se zove prodana duša.

Prodana Dušo, većina tvojih postova je anti-zapadna, anti-kapitalistička, anti-EU, anti-sve i svašta, ali nikad, ama baš nikad nisi napisa ništa kontra Rusije i svih hrpa govana koja smrde oko njih

Prodana Duša nikada neće gristi ruku koja je hrani.

Prvo se malo dogovori sa sobom. Jesu li prešli na GMO pamuk zbog larvi ili zbog količine koja je cca 20% veća kod GMO?

Si glup? Si ikad čuo za "dvije muhe jednim udarcem"? Ako se riješe larvi, koje su uništavale pamuk, hoće li onda količina pamuka ići gore ili dole?

[ruka-slave]

darkwood kaže:

Opet lažeš, i širiš propagandu i laži, ideš po temama od Ukrajine, Izraela do USA i samo sereš, kao da imaš proljev, i tu postavljaš linkove od stranica koje šire laži, propagandu i teorije zavjere, izvrćeš stvari, ignoriraš činjenice i širiš propagandu, i onda se tu nešto žališ kada te se zove prodana duša.

Prodana Dušo, većina tvojih postova je anti-zapadna, anti-kapitalistička, anti-EU, anti-sve i svašta, ali nikad, ama baš nikad nisi napisa ništa kontra Rusije i svih hrpa govana koja smrde oko njih

Prodana Duša nikada neće gristi ruku koja je hrani.

Malo smo mrzovoljni danas?

Si glup? Si ikad čuo za "dvije muhe jednim udarcem"? Ako se riješe larvi, koje su uništavale pamuk, hoće li onda količina pamuka ići gore ili dole?

20% u odnosu na obični pamuk a ne "larvasti", jer bi larve uništile većinu uroda, pa bi imao puno manji urod, a kvalitetu preživjelog pamuka ne treba ni spominjati.

Uostalom, gdje su nestale famozne larve?

[darkwood]

ruka-slave kaže:

Malo smo mrzovoljni danas?




20% u odnosu na obični pamuk a ne "larvasti", jer bi larve uništile većinu uroda, pa bi imao puno manji urod, a kvalitetu preživjelog pamuka ne treba ni spominjati.

Uostalom, gdje su nestale famozne larve?

Si ti toliko glup da se tebi svako objašnjenje mora žličicom hraniti?

Ajde idi kopaj po globalresearch.ca / mondialisation.ca ili sott da nađeš još sranja za istrpati na ovaj forum, jer copy/paste je izgleda maksimum tvojih mentalnih sposobnosti.

[TheProvense]

darkwood i ruka-slave, mir..stanite na loptu i primirite se..
komunikaciju tipa 'jesi ti glup' i slično, ne dozvoljavam..raspravljati se možete i bez toga..

također, molim vas da ne kopirate plahte teksta, odvojite dio koji smatrate važnim, nema potrebe za kopiranjem teksta u svakom postu od 1500 slova..

uz to, kad već kopirate tekst na stranom jeziku, obavezan je kratki opis na hrvatskom o čemu se radi..

a za početak, molim mir..

[tihobl]

darkwood kaže:

@ruka-slave
Prvo si proba svaliti svu krivnju za samoubojstva farmera u Indiji na Monsanto, ignorirajući činjenicu da Indija ima velikih problema sa samoubojstvom farmera općenito, i da najveća krivnja leži u politici i globalnom zatopljenju.

Sad te je dotukao glbalnim zatopljenjem

Ovaj izgovor treba iskoristiti Plenkovic da opravda praznjenje Slavonije.

[BlaireWhiteFan]

Indija bi mogla dekriminalizirati homoseksualne odnose (opet)

[ruka-slave]

Izvor bogatsva Brtinaije - Indija. Ukrali su im 45 bilijun a(trillions USD) tijekom 200 godina.

https://www.sott.net/article/401330-...-top-economist
Britain ruled India for about 200 years, a period that was marred with extreme poverty and famine. India's wealth depleted in these two centuries. Renowned economist Utsa Patnaik, who has done a research on the fiscal relations between Colonial India and Britain, has tried to answer a question many Indians are likely to be interested to know -- how much money did Britishers take away from India? Patnaik, in her essay published in Columbia University Press recently, said Britain drained out over $45 trillion from India, which to date has hampered the country's ability to come out of poverty.

Patnaik said the scars of colonisation remain despite Britain leaving India over 70 years ago. "Between 1765 and 1938, the drain amounted to 9.2 trillion pounds ($45 trillion), taking India's export surplus earnings as the measure, and compounding it at a 5 per cent rate of interest," Patnaik said during an interview with Mint.
...

Putting forward some shocking figures, Patnaik said while people of India died due to malnutrition and several other diseases just like "flies", the Britishers kept taking away hard-earned money of poor Indians. "...Indian expectation of life at birth was just 22 years in 1911," said Utsa.

She said Britain exported foodgrains and imposed high taxes, which spread famine in India and reduced its purchasing power. As per the economist, per capita annual consumption of food, which was 200 kg in 1900, went down to 137kg during World War II in 1946. She said India's position at the time of independence was dismal on all social factors.

Before Utsa, Congress leader and writer Shashi Tharoor, in his book Inglorious Empire, had also called British prime minister Winston Churchill, who is considered as a great wartime leader and protector of freedom of speech, one of "the worst genocidal dictators". "This is a man the British would have us hail as an apostle of freedom and democracy when he has as much blood on his hands as some of the worst genocidal dictators of the 20th century," he said during an interview broadcast with ABC.

A to je samo Indija. Gdje su još svi ostali koje su popljačkali.

[Beljki]

Kao i sve nacije i kao i sve populisticke desnice (koja je u Indiji politicki dominantna) i opcenito populizmi i tu se voli sve svoje probleme olako svaljivati na mitskog neprijatelja.

Bas se pitam i li stanje bilo puno bolje da nije bilo Britanaca. U stvari da ih nije bilo pitanje je bi li bilo i Indije kao jedinstvenog politickog entiteta.

Nepal i Butan iznad Indije nisu bili kolonizirani (vecinom) pa su u gorem stanju.

Kad se racuna koliko je Britanija izvukla iz Indije, cak i ako su izracuni tocni, ne moze se pretpostaviti da bi bez njih produktivnost bila jednaka, da bi vise ostalo obicnom stanovnistvu (to su bila feudalna vremena) itd.

[zeljko_ri]

ruka-slave kaže:

Izvor bogatsva Brtinaije - Indija. Ukrali su im 45 bilijun a(trillions USD) tijekom 200 godina.

A to je samo Indija. Gdje su još svi ostali koje su popljačkali.

Sve današnje velesile su bivše kolonijalne sile i bogate su zahvaljujući pljački i eksploataciji drugih. Sad da li bi Indija bolje stajala da nije bilo Britanaca, to je druga priča.

[tihobl]

ruka-slave kaže:

Izvor bogatsva Brtinaije - Indija. Ukrali su im 45 bilijun a(trillions USD) tijekom 200 godina.

A to je samo Indija. Gdje su još svi ostali koje su popljačkali.

Na to slijedi odgovor:

darkwood kaže:

ruka-slave = Fake News, so sad. :klap:

Svi znamo da su indijci sami krivi za stanje, a ne britanci, koji nisu nikoga opljackali. Ko je kriv indijcima sto su vise trosili nego sto su zaradjivali? Ko ih je tjerao da uvoze robe, umjesto da sami prizvode? Ko ih je tjerao da svoj BDP slupaju na Tadz Mahal i slicne gradjevine, umjesto da se industalizuju.